Friday, July 26, 2013

Session 5: Connected


1. "Connected: An Autobiography About Love, Death, & Technology" By Tiffany Shlain
    After viewing the film, what particularly struck you as powerful or important?



The Right Brain and the Female Gender:

In the beginning of the film, Shlain discusses the left versus the right brain. This discussion of the sides of the brain being stronger in males and females was something I studied in college, but also thought that it was only partly true. The difference between one male and another male can be just as different as a male and a female, for example. But maybe less so in brain processes.


She talked about her father's work in recognizing the role of language in our currently male-dominated society. Before language and in its beginnings, Goddesses were the ones held up and worshiped over Gods.  Language made our world very analytic, favoring the left side of the brain, leading to domination by males. Problems were broken down into parts in order to solve, which eventually lead to the foundations of "science." This "divide & specialize" technique became the focus of our world that drove progress, making everything more efficient and giving humans free time. Yet, the costs that were reviewed were only financial and everything else in the world humans used to be connected with every day in order to live was and is ignored.

With the creation of the internet, words and pictures have been brought together in a way that is constant. We rarely see words without any pictures or graphics and videos and pictures almost always have words. This combination of the right and left brain is beginning to change society again. I wonder if the rise in women empowerment, women focusing on careers just as much as men, seeking roles in government and male-dominated fields is a part of this change. Women make up the majority of students in colleges and outperform males in education. Has the internet, and technology (and thus the empowerment and increased importance of the right brain) actually began to influence gender in society? This was a very striking thought I had during the film and can't wait to see what we see change over time in society with female "roles" changing and further knowledge and studies of brain chemistry.   




 Emotions & Sustainability:

Another aspect I found interesting was how emotions are what causes us to do the things we do. Some people think it is the knowledge we have that we will die some day but Shlain's mother believed that emotions drove us. I think I agree more with her mother as death (maybe just because I am on the younger side) seems so abstract and somewhat painful to have in our consciousness, so I think it is probably buried deeper down and emotions, which are deep and shallow, drive our everyday and long-term motivations.

Oxytocin, which is released when humans connect with each other was interesting. In the film, they say that if you hug someone for more than six seconds it is automatically released and new mothers are flooded with it. This may explain the "science" behind the mother-child bond and how mothers can know their baby's cry out of a bunch of babies, when it sounds the same to everyone else.

Dopamine was also discussed. This is a pleasure hormone and is never satisfied. It leaves us always wanting more, which is a huge foundation of our consumer-driven, overindulgent society. This connects directly to education and my classroom as well. We have created this world in which we have all of this free time but usually spend it all on things that will increase our dopamine levels and decrease stress. In education, we need to find ways to involve fun in learning so students' dopamine is activated and increased, but also teach children what is important and really teach them how to live in moderation. This will help us lead to a sustainable world. The film was interesting overall, and I appreciate the reminder of how the world is connected, which is a benefit, but should also be constant reminder that what we do effects everyone else in the world.







Also! Tiffany Shlain was the speaker at my graduation from UC Berkeley in 2010! Woo Hoo!!!



Responded to:
Emily Esguerra
Karen May

Friday, July 19, 2013

Session 4: Lenses & Unions

1.       Disciplinary Lenses
·         “Disciplines are not collections of certified facts; rather, they are lenses through which we look at the world and interpret it…they orient our attention to specific questions about the world…and provide us with standards for what counts as viable answers to such questions,” (Boix Mansilla, Gardner, and Miller).
·         One specific way content research thus far has caused you to re-think about an idea, or question, or caused you to challenge assumptions that you had previously not considered – or – even pushed you further in your thinking?

        For my content research, I have been reviewing non-fiction texts, and lots of hands-on and experiential learning – mostly science-related. What has surprised me most is the wealth of resources, materials, and information about non-fiction. I am focusing on how to bring these resources and type of learning into K-2 classrooms, which makes it more difficult, but the amount of teachers and educators that are using hands-on, project-based, or experiential learning in their classrooms today (K-12) is amazing! I am so happy to see this, even though it is hard to do with today’s focus on following strict standards, schedules, and standardized test preparation. I wonder if the increasing focus and push on the testing is almost creating a type of backlash among teachers to revamp and recreate their classrooms into these interactive learning environments. It will be interesting to see what changes occur over the next ten years with the integration, acceptance, and settling into common core.

        On a more content-focused note, the science topics studied, or even available for students to read in their book choice time, seems to be extremely limited to life sciences. While kids grow up learning about animals, I feel it is the school’s job to introduce topics they do not learn at home. Rather than continuing to learn about animals (only), students should begin to learn about other areas of science (astronomy, geology, ecology, genetics, molecular, physical – electricity, light, waves, magnets, thermodynamics, chemistry, earth, matter, etc.) at a young age so when they do reach secondary school they are prepared with a real understanding of the basics. Also, the need for students to start using the science inquiry and processes is usually missing from elementary classrooms. There is a growing amount of books written to encourage student’s inquiry into topics and ones that ask questions of the reader to get them thinking rather than just listing facts. I have found these books especially interesting and exciting for the development of young, curious minds!







2.       Ravitch Response
·         How do you think the Common Core standards might fit in this narrative of school reform?
·         In Chapter 9, Ravitch says critics argue that schools would improve if unions ceased to exist. What do you think?

I think the most interesting thing about Common Core will be how they will test these standards in the new STAR tests being created and released soon. For a couple of years students will be taking STAR tests still designed off the old standards and not Common Core (– right?). This doesn’t make sense and shows the inaccuracies that arise when education is treated like a business and with so much ineffective school reform. Hopefully, the move to common core will turn a positive focus back on teachers and give teacher’s more credit now that more is expected from us in implementing teaching strategies and having more freedom with the curriculum.
               
First of all, the bureaucracy and delay that occurs in firing bad teachers, or at least the ones who have actually broke the law, is extremely frustrating and this process is much longer because of the unions. Also, with all of this anti-business talk, unions themselves are businesses, which is an important point often looked over. They are basically hired by teachers to protect our interests but work on a financial incentive - different than teachers (I mean really, who becomes a teacher for the pay?!).

However, teachers unions serve many purposes that are still very important. In addition, the union does protect teachers in ways that teachers need that most other professions do not require. For example, unions protect teachers from getting dismissed based simply on performance. The problem with this blanket type of merit pay is that a teacher’s performance is not directly related to student performance. How things move between human beings is unpredictable and teachers can only do their best, but this does not mean every child will improve to the amount expected every year. Psychiatrists do not get paid based on their patient’s improvement or getting cured. In some way’s psychiatrists have a stronger incentive to keep their patients from improving so they continue to receive their business. This is not the model we want for schools – teachers not teaching kids so they have to be held back, or receive more services – NO! By having school public (and not in a business model) and unions, teachers’ salaries will be kept up across the board. I can see how merit incentives (instead of the base pay) would work well as this would give teachers an extra incentive to work hard and do everything they can to help their students improve. However, this raises the biggest issue in education. How do you assess if students are improving. Right now? With standardized testing. However, as Ravitch points out, the best education is not designed to help students pass these tests. So the question remains as to how to quantify education?

Dangers of Privatization


Didn't think about this aspect of a merit pay system! Ahhh!

The negative side - all of this bureaucracy hurts our kids!


·         I was doing more research on this subject and came across this:
“I feel like an anachronism as I try to uphold standards of excellence in a world of mediocrity.
I know why I have continued to teach for these many years—it’s all about my students. I get positive feedback from former students who have gone on to success in higher education and in careers. “Thank you, Mrs. Hart, for teaching me how to write” is an oft-heard comment.” – Beverly Hart from her letter posted on Diane Ravitch’s blog, June 2013.

This reminds me of my K-12 and college education and how day-to-day I would have to work hard in classes like Mrs. Hart’s but would appreciate what I had learned later that year and years into the future. What is difficult about this concept in elementary school is that we are teaching students to think critically and learn the basics so they are ready to take in and use the things they will learn (and remember learning) later in their educational careers. Sometimes it is hard to see the progress with youngsters versus secondary students. But I will always stay committed to expecting excellence from my students, rather than teaching to a test so they can scrape by, no matter the population I am serving. By teaching to the test I may look good to the outside world, but to myself I will look horrible. My job and passion is to teach my students valuable skills and knowledge and I will do this: test or no test.


·         In my research I also found this article about Chicago schools interesting: http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/27_02/27_02_sokolower.shtml
“Once he was elected, Emanuel was so enamored of a longer school day that last year—in the middle of our contract—he went directly to schools to ask them to take a waiver and do the longer school day with no additional compensation, trying to bribe principals with $150,000 per school and teachers with free iPads…That’s what happens when you have people running the school system who come from the business world…
While parents liked the longer day, they also thought we should be compensated for it. They didn’t like the idea of forcing people to work longer without being paid for it. Parents are very clear about if you work, you get paid. And the entire time, we were having conversations with our parents about what would make school better; we always had a different vision of what school should look like. We said, “You have the right to a longer day, but let’s make it a better day, because if you’re only elongating the day we have, everyone’s just going to get tired. There’s no evidence that a longer day in itself is better.” Parents wanted art, music, PE, world languages. They wanted classes that were not just reading and math all day long.”

I loved this quote because it shows some of the thinking behind the business view of education and why it doesn’t work well and the polling of parents’ views of teacher union battles. I think these parents had a great view of education. The longer is not what is important – it’s making it BETTER! And if having school run longer to have time to involve these subjects, then great! Often, I think the teacher profession is viewed so differently from other jobs. Being a teacher is equivalent with other jobs that require talented, creative, cooperative, and responsible people. These are usually the highest paid professions as they rely more on the individual’s characteristics than their simple ability to conduct and complete a list of things to do or a variety of step-by-step like processes throughout the day. And yet, we are not treated as valuable, with competitive salaries commensurate with our education, experience, or work load. Parents do understand what we do. When polls of the general public are taken, a minority percentage of these people are parents – something to keep in mind.



·         Lastly:

A bill addressing the firing and discipline of teachers passed in April.  Unions, teachers, government, and politicians all agreed (how unusual!): http://www.sacbee.com/2013/04/03/5314678/california-teacher-discipline.html

Commented on:
Meghan Overby
Kusy Espinoza

Friday, July 12, 2013

Session 3: The Raising of America

1.       What strikes you as most important in this discussion of the relationship between social policy, child development, and later achievement?

These facts strongly stood out to me. Americans fought strongly for unpaid maternity leave, while most similar countries provide guaranteed paid maternity leave. Most mothers are back to work within three months of birth of a child and 70% of children are raised by working parents.

The cost and benefit brought up in the video was very interesting in the social policy perspective. I believe that many people think more about the parents of children rather than the children themselves, and think that because of choices adults may have made they do not deserve care for their young children. But social policy looks at the child alone. Providing education, affordable child care, flexibility at work with pre and post-natal care appointments that are paid for, paid leave for mothers and fathers, and nursing breaks like the examples discussed in the video will lead to severely lower crime rates, thus preventing the extreme costs associated with the legal and prison systems. As a country we finally are focusing on prevention medicine, but why not on crime and social decline prevention?

The hardest part of this is accomplishing the structural changes, but especially the delay between investing in young children and when these children enter the working world twenty years later. This truly is an investment. I recently found out that educators from China are partnering with the charter school I am working at in the fall. This falls right in line with the video discussion of other countries jumping on the undeniable research.



2.       What do you think this perspective adds to the discussion of school reform?

As more and more of my friends and family have children, I find that they struggle to be able to stay at home and raise their children. Many have expressed how they look forward to their child being old enough to attend public school simply because they will not have to pay so much for child care. This is not to get rid of their child by any means. They want to stay at home and raise their kids but need the money their jobs provide. Yet having both parents work, but then paying half or more of one parent’s salary for child care doesn’t seem to make much sense, either. Affordable child care is definitely needed.  Because of the increasing need for parents to work, public education is becoming increasingly a type of nanny care rather than a place to create a strong foundation for increasing intelligence and fostering creativity. Providing resources, paid time off, and financial incentives for families with young children will create a huge difference in not only the positive development of children, but also the national attitude towards the importance and purpose of true education.

I especially enjoyed at the end of the sample reel when they discuss how we have so much information and research behind the value of education and investing in caring and providing for our children (especially at a young age), and yet do so little in acting on this research by changing policy.
At the end of the sample reel, James Heckman (a Nobel Laureate in Economics) touched on how investing in a child (more education and care, etc.) will result in such high returns for all of society. This reminded me of reading Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. Levitt (an economist) presented a very controversial but strongly researched theory about why the severe crime drop occurred in the 1990’s. Males aged 18-24 are the most likely to commit crimes. Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in 1973 and crime began to drop about 18 years later when these unwanted children would have entered the peak crime-committing years. I do not make any comments or opinions about abortion, but find the idea of unwanted children presented in the book another source of evidence in this overall argument to invest in our country’s children. These children are born into families that do not have the resources to raise their children and have no support from our country to help them do so. These are the children that end up neglected, because of the lack of social policy support to assist in the growth of our children.



I admire and applaud the Granite school district for investing in low income students rather than giving up and doing the “easy” thing by sending them into special education. By not paying attention to our children and working with them at their level to raise them up but rather passing them along into programs that believe them to be less than their potential, we are setting up our students, citizens, and country for failure. Let’s invest in our students and truly set each and every one up for success.



3.       What is one question these videos raise for you?

The state competition of businesses interferes with the overall success of the nation. I wonder if the differences in state curriculum add to this competition rather than supporting students. Would a national plan, structure, fund, or curriculum be beneficial?




Blogs I responded to:
Sarah Wilkerson
Jeff Vangene

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Session 2: Mind the Gap

1.       Chapter 1: Choose 2 statements, quote them and personally respond.

·         “Over the years, I have consistently warned against the lure of ‘the royal road to learning,’ the notion that some savant or organization has found an easy solution to the problems of American education. As a historian of education, I have often studied the rise and fall of grand ideas that were promoted as the sure cure for whatever ills were affecting our schools and students.”

I think that this is such a key statement when it comes to evaluating our school system. There is no easy cure that can be implemented in only a couple of years. While I would like to think a major overhaul of the whole system would make a huge difference in how our school system is funded, resourced, and implemented, I also know there will still be problems. I also think this view reflects America and our general way of thinking about most things. Our society looks for easy fixes, such as finding a magic pill or antidote for every ill, or throwing money at a problem, rather than taking the time to evaluate the problem and finding the best way. When did this laziness or impatience become such a part of our general American viewpoint?

·         “We must ensure that students gain the knowledge they need to understand political debates, scientific phenomena, and the world they live in. We must be sure they are prepared for the responsibilities of democratic citizenship in a complex society. We must take care that our teachers are well educated, not just well trained. We must be sure that schools have the authority to maintain both standards of learning and standards of behavior.”

I find this to be a very important quote because the focus of our government and school boards, etc. always seems to be on meeting the standards through STAR testing and other unnatural measures. Yet, we do not seem to evaluate if our education system is creating productive, caring citizens. As educators, we teach our children to evaluate the world, see problems as they are and look for ways to solve them that help everyone, not just themselves. This takes teaching compassion, connecting knowledge, and critical thinking, not just if they can add 2+2. These things are not a part of our standards, yet society expects us to teach these things as well, but does not hold students or teachers accountable. I believe that if we do not refocus education’s purpose and include these sorts of things in education’s accountability, they will be lost as important components of a moral and just America.


2.       Quote Ravitch’s definition of a well-educated person (wep). How would I characterize a wep? What should any wep know in today’s world?

·         “Knowledge and skills are both important, as is learning to think, debate, and question. A well-educated person has a well-furnished mind, shaped by reading and thinking about history, science, literature, the arts, and politics. The well-educated person has learned how to explain ideas and listen respectfully to others.”

I agree with Ravitch’s definition of a well-educated person. I would characterize a well-educated person as someone who is well-read enough to understand a variety of points-of-view, can construct opinions on many topics based on sound knowledge and fact, and can express themselves clearly and respectfully.  The opinions I speak of relate primarily to what is important in today’s world. Part of the essential knowledge to be a well-educated person today is to know about the past and how efforts in the past affect today. Many of the problems we have today have been previously addressed and knowing what they are, if they worked or not, and why are keys to preventing repeated mistakes. Knowing our history is key for a well-educated person. And by history, I mean in literature, politics, governments, scientific principles & discoveries, inventions, medical research, etc. History is not limited to major events throughout U.S. history. With increasing globalization, it is even more vital than before to be aware of the entire world’s happenings and keep updated on these.

A well-educated person questions!


3.       Thinking about the class discussion on the book, what stands out? Anything not said?

In class, we discussed education as a business model. The main difference is the end result of education versus the end result of a business. A business creates a product to make money. Education creates a product. But the product is not cultured to make money. Education’s goal is to nurture and guide children to become the best people they can be. This is a benefit to society as a whole but very much is not a financial one. This is why education cannot be successful with a business model. The end product does not end with the type of means the investment expects.

I learned a lot about national versus state standards from the book and our discussion. The history of the standards movement particularly interested me in that national standards are not allowed to be imposed on states because education is a right given to the states to create and enforce. However, I believe that national standards could be a great uniting force to get states to use each other’s strengths to find the best practices and curriculum possible for all of America’s children. It is sad that after only one large debate, our government decided to simply give up on the national standards rather than work at editing to find standards everyone could accept. Having national standards that states can look at as reference and as a basis could also help America get back on track in its goals of education. If done well, they could help us back away from such a heavy focus on testing, and get back to a focus on the student.

4.       Choose one gap from my subject knowledge. ID 3 resources: web site, article, and book that can help fill this gap. List and discuss what I learned from one.

Because I will be teaching Kindergarten in the fall, I decided to see if there are areas in the Common Core Kindergarten curriculum I was not comfortable with. Unsurprisingly to me, the history section is one gap in my knowledge. Not only do I feel I need to learn the true history behind many of America’s holidays, but a few of the people listed as American legends (Pocahontas, George Washington, Booker T. Washington, Daniel Boone, and Benjamin Franklin), I know little about. So I chose Booker T. Washington to focus on as I know very little about him.

Book: Up from Slavery by Booker T. Washington
Article: Bly, A.T. (2008). Navigating the print line: Shaping readers’ expectations in Booker T. Washington’s autobiographies. Alabama Review, 61(3), 190-215.

                This website gives a good, but brief biography of Booker T. Washington’s life. It outlines his early life, education, his founding of the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial institute (to train young African Americans to be productive, contributing members of society), and his death and legacy. What I found most interesting was the many videos the website had about Booker T. Washington. The combination of pictures from the time period and testimonials from many experts on Washington was very educational. Washington was willing to trade political and voting rights for economic rights for African Americans, while others such as W.E.B. Du Bois clashed with this view. Du Bois fought for full rights.  Washington believed that subordination to whites was a necessary evil until African Americans proved they were worthy of full economic and political rights. He wrote books and essays about his beliefs and gave speeches to both white and black audiences. He was the first African American invited to the White House (by Theodore Roosevelt in 1901).


5.       Discuss in detail why/how two of my resources were useful to my topic. Consider listing specific info I did not know before, how this leads to other questions/sources, why writer was convincing, look for other articles by same author?, anything else!

Resources:
1.       Palmer, R. G., & Stewart, R. A. (2005). Models for using nonfiction in the primary grades. Reading Teacher, 58(5), 426-434.
2.       Correia, M. (2011). Fiction vs. informational texts: Which will kindergartners choose? Young Children, 66(6), 100-104.

Both of these resources delved into the use of nonfiction in the primary grades. In the first article, I learned more about how different models of teaching nonfiction can be very helpful in teaching children how to completely comprehend nonfiction and how to utilize non-fiction sources independently. This article was particularly helpful in the amount of sources it used to summarize these models and the research behind the author’s writing. I plan to use many of these resources in expanding my content knowledge and to apply to my literature review.
The second article was very interesting because the author did a small experiment and conducted observations of her kindergarten class’s genre preferences. This was not an empirical study that used specific methods and critiqued the implementation of the observations, but all the same did give insight into how kindergarteners think and how they feel about non-fiction. The focus on motivating young students to read by using non-fiction text was really interesting as I had also believed that young students really did prefer fiction and stories over informational texts. I also liked how the author describes using all types of informational text [“…cereal box covers, brochures from amusement parks and museums, magazines like Sports Illustrated for Kids, and colorfully illustrated children’s cookbooks.”(102)], rather than only non-fiction books.



Teaching children to be positive, productive, caring human beings!

Commented on:
Hilary Kuhn
David Bowen
Erin Brindley